IP ASIA

Hermès vs Hermes: Books win over Fashion

This is the story of a legal battle between a small bookshop called Hermes in Izmir, Turkey, and the luxury French fashion house Hermès: another case that highlights the complexities of trademark law and the clash between global brands and local businesses.

Background of the Case

The Hermes bookshop, owned by Umit Nar, has been operating for 15 years in the seaside town of Izmir, Turkey. It is named after the Greek god Hermes, who is historically linked to the region, given that Izmir was once known as Smyrna, a place steeped in ancient Greek mythology.

Hermès, the iconic French luxury brand, is well-known globally for its high-end fashion items, including the famous Birkin and Kelly bags. The brand also extends into other areas, including publishing its magazine. This broad scope of operations forms part of their argument in protecting the trademark.

Legal Battle

The conflict began in 2021 when Umit Nar sought to register a trademark for his bookshop. Hermès Paris opposed this registration, claiming that there was a "similarity and risk of confusion" between the bookshop’s name and their brand. Hermès argued that their global recognition and involvement in publishing made the use of "Hermes" by the bookshop problematic.

The fashion house's legal team argued that the name "Hermes" is strongly associated with their brand, and any other use could cause confusion, particularly given their diverse business interests, including publishing.

The bookshop owner argued that in 15 years, no one had ever confused his store with the luxury brand. He also invoked the cultural and historical significance of the name Hermes, associated with the ancient history of Izmir, making the name part of the local heritage rather than a mere brand identifier.

Turkey’s intellectual property authority, TurkPatent, initially sided with Hermès Paris, preventing any other brand from using the name "Hermes" in Turkey.

The case escalated to the Ankara court, where Umit Nar fought against the decision.

On August 16, 2024, the court partially voided TurkPatent's decision, allowing the bookshop to continue using the name "Hermes." This ruling signifies a win for the small business owner against the giant luxury brand, emphasizing the distinction between the two entities - one being a local bookshop and the other a global fashion powerhouse.

Cultural and Historical Arguments

Nar's defense highlights how cultural and historical connections to a name can be as important as commercial interests in trademark disputes. His argument that Hermes, like Zeus or Santa Claus, belongs to humanity's cultural heritage, underscores the broader implications of trademark law when it intersects with historical and cultural references.

The case is a classic example of David vs. Goliath: a small business standing up to a global corporation. 

Such legal battles are rare because of the financial and time constraints on smaller entities. However, Nar’s victory demonstrates that with the right arguments and legal support, small businesses can successfully defend their rights against larger opponents.

Potential Next Steps

Appeal Possibility: While the Ankara court ruled in favor of the bookshop, it is not yet clear if Hermès Paris will appeal the decision. If they do, the legal battle could continue, potentially leading to higher courts. However, given the public and cultural resonance of Nar's arguments, the case could also end here.

Impact on Similar Cases: This case could set a precedent for similar disputes, where global brands attempt to enforce their trademarks against smaller, culturally significant entities. It may encourage other small businesses to stand up against large corporations in trademark disputes.

Comment

While the Ankara court ruled in favor of the small bookshop, allowing it to continue operate under the name "Hermes" and using it in its marketing and branding within Turkey, the situation regarding the trademark registration is more complex.
The court recognized the cultural and historical significance of the name "Hermes" in the context of the bookshop's location in Izmir, Turkey, and acknowledged that there was no confusion between the bookshop and the luxury fashion brand Hermès Paris.
While the court's ruling allowed the bookshop to use the name, it did not necessarily grant the bookshop the right to register "Hermes" as a trademark, which is the reason why Hermes Paris initially stood up against the bookshop. 
Anyway, the Hermes bookshop case in Izmir is a significant example of how trademark law can be navigated when cultural heritage and local significance are at play. 
It highlights the balance that must be struck between protecting a brand's commercial interests and respecting the cultural and historical context of a name.

Related content